How NHS RTT 18-week performance varies by Integrated Care Board
Reviewed by PlainNHS · · Source: NHS England RTT statistics
The ICB ranking
Across 266 English providers with 1,000+ incomplete pathways, 65.5% sit within 18 weeks (NHS target 92%). ICB means stretch from GLOUCESTERSHIRE at 73.7% to ESSEX at 56.2% (17.5 percentage points), weighted by each ICB's waiting-list size.
- 65.5%
- Incomplete pathways within 18 weeks (weighted national mean)
- 73.7%
- GLOUCESTERSHIRE, highest ICB mean (n=3 providers)
- 56.2%
- ESSEX, lowest ICB mean (n=8 providers)
- 17.5 pp
- Spread between highest and lowest ICB means
URL slug keeps the historical /research/rtt-performance-by-region path. The commissioning field in NHS England's provider return is the ICB name, not the seven NHS England geographic regions. Providers with fewer than 1,000 incomplete pathways excluded. Vintage September 2026. Registry voice only, not clinical advice.
Top ICBs by within-18-week share
Highest waiting-list-weighted ICB means first. NHS operational target remains 92%.
What share gets an ICB into the top five?
An ICB needs a waiting-list-weighted within-18-week share of at least 69.4% to enter this month's top five. The distribution shows how concentrated the current field is, rather than treating every rank gap as equally meaningful.
-
Below 60%
1 ICB
-
60–64.9%
13 ICBs
-
65–69.9%
15 ICBs
-
70% or more
4 ICBs
ICB means, highest to lowest
Waiting-list-weighted share within 18 weeks for every ICB with at least three qualifying providers.
Within-ICB provider spread
Gap between each ICB's highest and lowest provider pct_within_18w. Large spreads mean the ICB mean hides trust-level choice.
A higher ICB mean can still hide a wide trust-level gap
Each point is an ICB. The horizontal axis is its waiting-list-weighted within-18-week share; the vertical axis is the gap between its best and worst qualifying providers. The highlighted BLACK COUNTRY point has the widest provider spread at 65 percentage points.
This does not rank clinical quality or predict an individual wait. It is a prompt to compare named trusts when referral choice is available. Compare trusts Browse trust profiles.
Method
From NHS England's monthly consultant-led RTT provider return we take every English provider with at least
1,000 incomplete pathways, group by the commissioning Integrated Care Board
named in that return (stored in our region column for historical reasons), and compute a
waiting-list-weighted within-18-week share (sum of within_18w divided by sum of total_waiting).
ICBs with fewer than three qualifying providers are dropped so a single trust cannot define an ICB mean.
Min and max are the extreme provider-level percentages inside each ICB.
This is not a ranking of the seven NHS England geographic regions. Those labels live on the smaller trust profile set; the full provider return keys providers to ICBs. Figures refresh when a new NHS England monthly release is ingested. Descriptive registry analysis only.
Full ranking table
| # | Integrated Care Board | Providers | Weighted mean | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GLOUCESTERSHIRE | 3 | 73.7% | 73.5% | 85.9% |
| 2 | NORTH EAST AND NORTH CUMBRIA | 16 | 73.6% | 64% | 96% |
| 3 | BRISTOL, NORTH SOMERSET AND SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE | 6 | 71.9% | 68.9% | 99.6% |
| 4 | WEST YORKSHIRE | 11 | 70.3% | 65.5% | 100% |
| 5 | BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL | 7 | 69.4% | 58.9% | 80.2% |
| 6 | SOUTH YORKSHIRE | 6 | 68.2% | 55.8% | 78.7% |
| 7 | SOUTH EAST LONDON | 6 | 68.1% | 66.6% | 93.1% |
| 8 | WEST AND NORTH LONDON | 17 | 67.9% | 63.2% | 96.6% |
| 9 | SOUTH WEST LONDON | 7 | 67.9% | 64.8% | 92.4% |
| 10 | THAMES VALLEY | 8 | 67.6% | 62.5% | 84.4% |
| 11 | NORTH EAST LONDON | 6 | 67.2% | 57.3% | 85.2% |
| 12 | NOTTINGHAM AND NOTTINGHAMSHIRE | 4 | 66.8% | 64.8% | 76.7% |
| 13 | STAFFORDSHIRE AND STOKE-ON-TRENT | 6 | 66.6% | 57.5% | 92.5% |
| 14 | SOMERSET | 3 | 66.5% | 65.2% | 100% |
| 15 | BATH AND NORTH EAST SOMERSET, SWINDON AND WILTSHIRE | 6 | 66.5% | 56.9% | 80.8% |
| 16 | CHESHIRE AND MERSEYSIDE | 16 | 66% | 60.6% | 92.1% |
| 17 | SHROPSHIRE, TELFORD AND WREKIN | 4 | 65.7% | 53.6% | 82.9% |
| 18 | LANCASHIRE AND SOUTH CUMBRIA | 12 | 65.4% | 42.7% | 90.4% |
| 19 | DEVON | 5 | 65.1% | 55.1% | 85% |
| 20 | HAMPSHIRE AND ISLE OF WIGHT | 8 | 64.4% | 56.4% | 96.3% |
| 21 | BLACK COUNTRY | 6 | 64.1% | 9.8% | 74.8% |
| 22 | NORTHAMPTONSHIRE | 6 | 63.7% | 61.3% | 85.7% |
| 23 | KENT AND MEDWAY | 11 | 63.4% | 56.1% | 99.9% |
| 24 | NORFOLK AND SUFFOLK | 7 | 63.3% | 60.1% | 96.2% |
| 25 | HEREFORDSHIRE AND WORCESTERSHIRE | 3 | 63.2% | 61.9% | 63.8% |
| 26 | CENTRAL EAST | 13 | 63.2% | 54.3% | 92.9% |
| 27 | SURREY AND SUSSEX | 16 | 62.5% | 53.2% | 99.9% |
| 28 | GREATER MANCHESTER | 14 | 62.4% | 57.2% | 97.3% |
| 29 | DERBY AND DERBYSHIRE | 5 | 62.2% | 55.5% | 91.9% |
| 30 | COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIRE | 4 | 62.2% | 57.9% | 84.8% |
| 31 | LINCOLNSHIRE | 3 | 62.1% | 61.9% | 68.2% |
| 32 | HUMBER AND NORTH YORKSHIRE | 8 | 60.8% | 56.8% | 82.5% |
| 33 | ESSEX | 8 | 56.2% | 49.7% | 84.2% |
Reading the spread
The headline finding, an overall 65.5% weighted mean against the 92% operational target, matches the national picture NHS England has published through the elective backlog years. The 17.5 percentage-point gap between GLOUCESTERSHIRE and ESSEX is unlikely to be case-mix alone; published reviews from the Nuffield Trust and the King's Fund point to workforce, estate, and elective-recovery investment as geographic differentiators that also show up at ICB scale.
For patients using NHS Choose and Book where clinically permitted, trust-level choice inside an ICB often moves the needle more than crossing ICB boundaries. Use the comparison tool and trust profiles for provider-level waits.
Limitations
Coverage is English providers meeting the 1,000-pathway floor (266 rows , 7.1 million incomplete pathways). ICB means can still be dominated by a few large providers. RTT within-18 share is an operational process metric, not a clinical outcome. No case-mix adjustment is applied.
Source attribution
- NHS England, Referral-to-Treatment (RTT) Waiting Times, monthly release.
- NHS England, Elective Care Transformation Programme.
- PlainNHS, PlainNHS methodology.
Important: This page is descriptive statistical analysis. It is not medical advice. Always consult your GP, NHS 111, or the treating NHS Trust for clinical decisions.
Source: NHS England Referral to Treatment (RTT) waiting times · September 2026 ICB labels come from the commissioning region field on NHS England’s provider return, not the seven geographic NHS England regions.
Spotted a figure that looks wrong? Report a correction.
PlainNHS ICB rankings are rendered directly from NHS England RTT provider returns, no number is typed in by an editor. Waiting-list-weighted ICB means use sum(within_18w) / sum(total_waiting) from the live return. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error on this page. Data current as of September 2026. Figures here are for context and comparison; clinical pathway decisions belong with your GP, NHS 111, or the treating Trust.